Societal responses to regional climatic change
Forecasting by Analogy
Michael H. Glantz, Editor
Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 428 pp.
Summary
A few quotes:
"The purpose of the book is to determine how flexible (or rigid
societies are or have been in dealing with climate-related environmental
change."
"Societies everywhere have already shown the propensity to prepare for
the last climate anomaly by which they were affected. However, such
anomalies seldom seem to recur in the same place with the same
intensity, or with the same societal impacts."
"Analogues can help us to identify societal strengths and weaknesses in
coping with extreme meteorological events..."
This book contains 10 cases studies of how citizens respond to regional
environmental changes that seem irreversible. The subjects of these
case studies are show in the figure below. Two of the ten case studies
are presented in this document; case 1 is the The Ogallala Aquifer Depletion, and case 2 is titled "Changes
in the Mississippi River System." The former case is also followed
by a summary of Donald Wilhite's article in Micchael Glantz's Societal Responses to
Regional Climate Change: Forecasting by Analogy
The following is Dr. Takle's summary of Glantz's summary from the
case studies
- There is a need to identify how societies respond
- Involvement of state and local government is very important
- There is a need to generate awareness among decisionmakers of the
problem
- There are sometimes conflicting signals
- An extreme event is the "straw that breaks the camel's back"
- Intergenerational equity is always an issue
- Ad hoc responses are favored over long-term planned responses
- In come cases, ad hoc decisions create rigidity that inhibit society's
ability to respond to future changes
- Coalition-building is an important part of creating awareness as well as
coping with climate-related problems
- Society is changing; it is necessary to take societal change into
account when considering responses to climate change
- If there are winners and losers, there will be large disincentives on
the part of winners to change.