Objectives
Class images
How climate models work. From UNEP. | |
Houghton, J. T., L. G. Meira Filho, B. A. Callander N. Harris, A. Kattenberg, and K. Maskell, 1996: Climate Change 1995. The Science of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, pp 236-245. | |
Houghton, J. T., G. J. Jenkins, and J. J. Ephraums, 1990: Climate Change, The IPCC Scientific Assessment. Cambridge University Press. p. 80-89. |
In class we talked more about climate modeling. We discussed the results of the models. When using the raw data from the computers perception is hard to predict, while the temperature is easier it is just a little bit high when compared to the actual temperatures. In some circumstances the models do not do a very good job. We looked at different models and compared how accurate each of them is. There is no clear best model, some work better in different areas and conditions. The average of all the models usually is the best to use when predicting the future climate. There is always varying circumstances that are not included in the models. The models do a good job including slow climate changes such as El Nino and volcanic eruptions. There are two types of models. The first is equilibrium model; it uses CO2 in the atmosphere as a sudden occurrence in the future. The transient model uses the increase of CO2 in the atmosphere as a gradual occurrence. This model is started in the past and taken to the future, sometimes a 200-year span is used. It can take up to a year to get results from this model.We also talked about how evaporation of water from the soil is always occurring no matter how dry the soil is. Roots help the process by bringing water up to the surface; thus keeping the soil temperature down. This evaporation also effects the air temperature. The vegetation on the soil and soil type effect temperature. Practices such as cutting trees down and cement effect temperature.
Cloud Catalog at the University of Illinois Weather Machine | |
Cloud Radiative Processes, NASA | |
Fractal Cloud Animations, California | |
Cess, R. D., et al., 1995: Absorption of solar radiation by clouds: observations vs. models. Science 267, 496-499. | |
Houghton, J.T., G.J. Jenkins, J.J. Ephraums, eds, 1990: 1990 Intergovernment Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, 77-80. | |
Kerr, Richard A., 1995: Darker clouds promise brighter future for climate models. Science 267, 454. | |
Lashof, D.A., 1989: The dynamic greenhouse: Feedback processes that may influence future concentrations of atmospheric trace gases and climatic change. Climate Change 14, 213-242. | |
Ramanathan, V., et al., 1995: Warm pool heat budget and shortwave cloud forcing: a missing physics? Science 267, 499-503. |
Intergovernmental Papers on Stabilization and Models | |
Dickinson, R. E., 1995: Walter Orr Robers Lecuture - Land surface processes and climate modeling. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 76, 1445-1448 | |
Henderson-sellers, A., and K. McGuffie, 1987: A Climate Modeling Primer. John Wiley & Sons. New York. 217 pp. | |
McGuffie, K., and A. Henderson-Sellers, 1997: A Climate Modelling Primer. Second Edition. John Wiley & Sons. New York. 253 pp. | |
Kerr, Richard A., 1997: Greenhouse Forecasting Still Cloudy. Science 276, 1040-1042. | |
Kerr, Richard A., 1997: Model Gets it Right--Without Fudge Factors. Science 276, 1041. | |
Trenberth, K.,1997: The Use and Abuse of Climate Models. Nature 386, 131-133. | |
Zeng, Xubin, R.A. Pielke, R. Eykholt, 1990: Chaos in Daisyworld. Tellus 4, 309-318. |